They spend hundreds of hours a week playing Grand Theft Auto, FIFE, Need For Speed and Call Of Duty. Even parents are the ones I would definitely blame, in my opinion, some games are only allowed to be played if 18 and over. However parents buy war games for their fifteen years old son. These games will build war in their heart, and make them feel aggressive. Yes aggressive. The aggressiveness will lead to children fight in school. In addition to that they will have anger problems. Children with anger problems are 85% from gaming. Do you agree? Old clearly agree with the American comedian Louis KC “he wouldn’t give his daughter cell phone for fear they wouldn’t develop empathy”. What Louis KC said is absolutely correct. Children use mobile phones such as Phone, blackberry and ETCH, to communicate without developing any social skills. Would prefer face to face because body language, eye contact, emotional feelings are being developed. However socializing using mobile phones do not develop any of these. But destroys them. In my opinion would strongly agree with Louis KC, and believe all parents should not give their children a cell phone.
Except emergencies. Children should use cell phones for one purpose only, which is communicating with parents in an important situation. Education is the key to success. Parents who buy games for their sons and expect them to achieve good grades are definitely wrong. In my survey 95% of the children said they play about 3-5 hours a day on week days. In my opinion that’s ridiculous, unacceptable and inappropriate. If I was a parent then my child will have a library than a cabled full of games. Different parents teach different things to their son/daughter, so blaming the parent is more useful Han blaming the child.
If the parents are expecting their child to become an educated man and have skills in their job than they have to focus on revising and achieving good grades at the end of the year. However network sites could be an advantage as well. Some teenagers use social networking in a good way such as asking a friend about homework. This indicates that social networking could be used in a good way as well. Some network sites also allow teenagers to meet new people and make new friends, which would allow them to develop their social skills.
In addition mom teenagers do not have the ability to socialism face to face, suggesting that social sites will allow them to express themselves. Additionally, social sites could be very useful for people that live in different countries to communicate. Students who studies abroad are able to communicate with their parents at any time and with no cost. In conclusion, would more agree with the disadvantages of social networking than the advantages. Even though Teenagers could communicate and share ideas, make new friends, or ask for homework.
In my opinion believe social outworking is destroying the world. This is because people stop seeing each other because they could communicate over the phone. In addition I also believe that social networking is stopping teenagers from revising and interrupting their education. So in my opinion believe that the disadvantages of social networking overweight the advantages. This is because social networking has many disadvantages. If education is the key to success then social networking is the locker. To open the locker you need the key so education would be the key to success.