As you see from obokata issue ,she lacks a sense of research ethics, Manipulatingthe data and images from other articles and experiments and used them in herarticles is not accepted behavior from a scientist researcher. so people mustbe awareness about the ethics of research from misconduct (fabrication, falsification,plagiarism)and learn from this misconduct if occurs, and every one must be responsible ofher / his own research, and should admission of scientific guilt , and givesapologist from this misconduct to give highest ethical standards.In my opinion maybe there’s many reasons that’s lead obokatato this level of misconduct . she has spent long hours in her experiment, growing, manipulating and testing cellsin differents way, and she sense withevery hypothesis there’s a hunch in mind and he has strong sense about what sheexpected .
and she really want to prove that her sense or lunch is right, that the money was invested into herwork was well spent, she want to get ahead in competitive field, with theintense pressure. But she has got her results and was surprised that herresults are disappointing, And she need to do like something a littlecreatively. And when she get rid of the original data, But once she startfiddling with the facts, it’s hard to stop.In part, that’s because she thought howeasy it is to fool her colleagues. Alsoshe has enjoyed their admiration and shewant be have a chance to published her research ,Maybe this reasons pushesobokata to this misconduct. to Maintaining thehighest ethical standards they should investigate the research , and takenseriously , so they did what they had to do to scientific misconduct ,As we cansee what the journal did about obokata 2 papers after scientificmisconduct, they deal with the issue byinvestigating the papers by themselves, nature journal was provided withdetails of ricken investigation . and evaluate whether the evidence availablesupports the main conclusions of the paper , And then decide to withdrawal 2papers.