Detecting Lies

In the article for the motion, James Geary claims that even though the average person isn’t very good at detecting lies people can be trained t become quite good at detecting lies. He provided evidence in the form of CLC Nicola case studies. In one of these case studies, Seaman interviewed a group of college SST dents about their opinion regarding capital punishment. The interviews where recorded and some of the students were instructed to lie. These tapes were use d by Seaman to improve and test ability to detect lies.

From his tests he found d that most people are lousy lie detectors but certain groups of people such a federal law enforcement officers and C. I. A. Believe the writers’ main intent for the article is to convince the rear deer that people can be trained to detect lies with a decent degree of accuracy. No: In the article against the motion, Bella M. De Paulo claims that the a average person isn’t very good at telling lies and that training in lie detection d isn’t greatly increase one’s ability to detect lies revived her evidence in the form of clinical case from other people.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

She also In one of these studies, the author and a colleague showed videos of people either lying or telling the truth. The results of the study showed that m cost people guessed truth even though there was an equal number of truths and lies in the recordings. I believe the writers’ main people can not be relied on especially if they don’t know intent for the article is to convince the rear to accurately detect the lies of most other the person.