ISIS, the group and fighters. They think it

ISIS, or the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria,are Muslims who have taken over large parts of northwestern Iraq and Syria. Itis a terrorist group that wants to establish a pure Islamic State. Their goalis to get rid of disbelievers, and they often use violence. It was created afterthe United States invasion of Iraq in 2003. Nowadays, ISIS causes a lot ofconflicts and casualties all over the world. In order to stop the spreading ofterrorism, United States was finding solutions to defeat them. However, to getrid of them, people have different opinions about it.

Should United States putboots on the ground to fight ISIS? Some people argue that if the U.S. only usesair power, ISIS will conceal in the cities and the U.S. might cause a lot of civiliancasualties to kill the group and fighters. They think it is the most effectiveway is to send troops to defeat ISIS. On the other hand, some people havedifferent opinions. They think it is not a necessary way to put boots on theground, because it will lead to serious casualties, and might lead to furtherconflicts.

Best services for writing your paper according to Trustpilot

Premium Partner
From $18.00 per page
4,8 / 5
4,80
Writers Experience
4,80
Delivery
4,90
Support
4,70
Price
Recommended Service
From $13.90 per page
4,6 / 5
4,70
Writers Experience
4,70
Delivery
4,60
Support
4,60
Price
From $20.00 per page
4,5 / 5
4,80
Writers Experience
4,50
Delivery
4,40
Support
4,10
Price
* All Partners were chosen among 50+ writing services by our Customer Satisfaction Team

Firstly, there are huge amount of soldiers in the past exampleswhere United States send troops to the foreign country died in the conflict.Most importantly, even they defeat them successfully, they might get negativeconsequences. If United States put boots on the ground, itwill give easy targets to terrorists.

In 1955, U.S. sent troops to fight NorthVietnam, however, they failed and cause high amount of death.  The United States involved in the conflictwith high expectations, so this might cause disappointment to the consequences.The war also made a big division in politics in the country. For someAmericans, they started to distrust the government officials, politicians, andthe military. In 1975, the South Vietnam defenses were destroyed.

Approximately60 thousands of Americans were died in this war. (1965: Boots on the Ground inVietnam)In addition, they sent troops to join amultinational peacekeeping force in Lebanon in 1983. On October 23, suicidebombers attacked place they stayed. Including 220 marines, over 300 werekilled.  It was the worst death toll in aday that the U.S. military had suffered since the Tet Offensive in Vietnam.

Thisshowed that if the U.S. sends small and weak contingents, it might bring some troubles.

(Killing ISIS: Five Reasons American ‘Boots on the Ground’ Will Backfire)The other example is the Operation IraqiFreedom, which started in March 2003, and ended in August 31, 2010. A total of4,409 U.S. troops and 13 Defense Department civilians were killed, and 31,925troops were injured. Even after combat operations ended and Operation New Dawntook place from September 2010 to December 2011, 66 U.

S. troops were killed and295 were wounded. Not only physical damages, there were also huge amount of thepsychological damages to the U.S. soldiers. (Clarion project: Why U.S. ShouldAvoid Sending Its Ground Troops to Fight ISIS)Additionally, the intervention in Afghanistanwas also a failure.

The Taliban continued to grow, and increase the tempo ofits military operations. This caused thousands death, which was a huge amount. “10years of experience in the Middle East to show that limited ground forces don’twork, military action would set back rather than advance the politicalreconciliation, and it would be a disincentive to provide actual tools topromote long-term stability” (Chris Murphy). Sending troops to Iraq or Syriamight cause high amount of casualties, which Americans want to avoid.  The use of American troops would cause hugeamount of death, the soldiers who fight for country would die in distant lands.Therefore, this will be the last option. Due to the high amount of casualties,United States should avoid and have other choice.

  (‘From Vietnam to Afghanistan, US militaryintervention has failed to deliver’) Moreover, sending troops to defeat ISIS willlead to larger conflict for a few reasons. If it leads to serious conflict,there will have bad consequences. During the occupation in Iraq in 2003, theUnited States removed people who had supported Saddam Hussein’s governmenttheir jobs. In the result, that made the Sunnis think that they don’t haveplace in the new Iraq. Because of the exclusion of the Sunnis, it contributedto a Sunni-led armed group which is like ISIS. ISIS became a major player after United Statesleft Iraq. Obama argued that if U.

S. troops defeat ISIS, some new groups ofextremists will likely rise up after U.S left.

His solution to this was built localgovernment and militaries, so they can control those terrorists. However, U.S.

troops might stay there, which would begin the colonialism. “Unless theIraqi government has the capacity to take the territory that’s been liberatedand govern the territory in a way that’s acceptable to people living there, itwon’t last,” said Michael Eisenstadt, who is director of the military andsecurity studies program. “They can’t send 20, 30 thousand people in, wrapit up in just a few months and live happily ever after, because the fundamentalproblems remain” (Bessma Momani). When they sent troops to fight withISIS, they will try to destroy them. However, after destroying, the societymight not be stable.

The central government will need to stabilize theenvironment and economy, and also get everything back to the right track. To beable to do these, they need money. Iraq is unlikely to stabilize after ISIS isdefeated in urban areas for some reasons. One of the reasons is the Kurdishforce. Since the Kurdish force in the north was a powerful strength indefeating ISIS, they had higher status.

The Iraqi government wanted thedisputed territories returned, but the Kurds stated that they will not pullback from disputed territories or cede Kurd-occupied communities to the centralgovernment. Therefore, there might have civil conflicts between the Kurds andcentral government, which cause political instability. After defeating ISIS,The United States will need to face serious questions after the defeat of ISIS.Such as “Who will fill the spaces from which the ISIS is driven?” This leads tothe conclusion, the defeat of the Islamic State will not end the involvement inMiddle East conflicts and may in fact lead it to increase. Therefore, put bootson the ground to defeat ISIS is not an effective way, because it will lead tomore serious conflicts, and some inevitable consequences.

In conclusion, United States should considerother effective ways to get rid of the problems that ISIS caused. To put bootson the ground is not the best way to solve the issues, because it will causehigh amount of death and lead to further conflicts. Therefore, they shouldavoid these and stay away from bad consequences.