According to Rehiring, people who work Jobs that are subsidized almost entirely by tips should be either paid more to begin with or offered more services such as housing and food like European countries do. For example, the typical 10% tip is considered borderline excessive at table service restaurants because waiters and waitresses are already paid substantially.
Also, it is common especially in Mediterranean countries for the 10-15% service charge to already be included in the prices displayed on the menu.As it becomes harder for someone to sustain a comfortable lifestyle off of tipping in America, this may be something the government will look into adopting. 2) Nickel and Dimmed wouldn’t have been too different if it had taken place in our community.
(Considering the bare minimum of anything in Potent, I’m including nearby towns. ) Job opportunities are extremely limited, but similar with the exception of maid services. Public transit is scare and most things are not within walking distance posing a problem as far as getting from point A to B.Housing is very minimal in Potent and can get pretty expensive, but security is great and the area is relatively noise free. However, the struggles encountered by living in poverty are pretty much the same everywhere as discovered by Rehiring. 3) Enrich routinely refers to food as “fuel” because when trying to eat as cheap as possible Just to stay going that’s really all it is. Enrich wasn’t eating for taste and certainly not pleasure as she often had no clue where her next meal was even coming from.When explaining why the lower class gravitates toward fast food, she explained that it’s not by choice; it’s all they can afford.
Poor nutrition and a lack of consuming the body vital nutrients probably contributed to Rehearing’s coworkers’ ailments. Correlations also exist between those in poverty and drugs. While the rich use drugs because of how easily accessible they are, the poor use them as a temporary escape from their problem.Especially with drugs such as cocaine and heroin, one use and the user can be immediately addicted, insinuating a perpetual need for more and posing threats for those addicted such as Job/home loss, and even death. 4) Rehearing’s wit absolutely makes her arguments more effective. Also, considering how depressing and stressful of a topic this is, her humor makes it relatable and bearable to read. However, at some points in the book I believe Rehiring went way overboard with ignorant, unnecessary comments.
For example, during her time as a maid, whenever she would go somewhere in her uniform she would be repeatedly, purposely ignored. She says, “Maybe, it occurs to me, I’m getting a tiny glimpse of what it’d like to be black. ” (Rehiring 100). She couldn’t have mounded any more ignorant if she tried. If she wanted to refer to the treatment of African Americans before the Civil Rights Movement, she really should have specified. The way she writes it she makes it sound like she is typically above them.
With a net worth of 2. Billion, Opera Winfred stomps on this stereotype with accolades such as being number thirteen on Forbears World’s Most Powerful Women (numbers four and seventeen being Michelle Obama and BeyondГ© Knowles, respectively). 5) By going undercover and actually working for a living at minimum wage first hand, Rehiring he would get from interviewing the people. When Rehiring finally comes out to her coworker at Wall-Mart, her coworker responds “l hope I haven’t said too many bad things about Wall-Mart” (Rehiring 190).If all Rehiring did was interview her, all she would have gotten is the censored, sugar-coated version.
That point of view would not have been very accurate as far as gaining insight to a life of poverty. 6) Rehiring only got to see the side of her coworkers away from work. All she knew were the stories they told her. Rehearing’s experience would have been much efferent if she’d seen their home lives, some of which included abusive boyfriends, starving children/parents, and even substance abuse.
Diving into such a harsh reality like this may have even forced her to quit her experiment early. She’d see an even more desperate side of them, not the put together version they tried to bring to work each day. 7) The author refers to her coworkers as “philanthropists of society’ because that’s what they are.
All they do is give and give and they get nothing but minimum wage in return. Typically, if someone is considered a philanthropist, they re making upwards of three figures a year and donating large sums of money to various organizations.But these donations barely make a dent in their bank account and they always can continue living comfortably. Rehearing’s coworkers do all the behind-the-scenes work that makes it all happen, yet they hardly even get a “thank you” now and then. 8) The author thinks the drug/personality tests are unfair because management treats the workers they have like they’re criminals.
All of their belongings can be searched at any time once they’re on the property and they could e a suspect of something they didn’t do at any point in time.In a sense, it’s actually very close to how public schools are run. I think they should still give workers drugs tests, but personality tests? Anyone in their right mind would lie and put down the “right” answers if they knew it would get them the Job. It doesn’t make any sense how management has the ability to Judge a person through a test.
If two people met each other on the street, one wouldn’t Just whip out a test for the other and that’s because character can’t be “tested”, it Just shows.