USA atomic bombing on Himoshita

So the article provided by them is professional and deep emendable which can provide a deep and comprehensive understanding and analysis of this his Eric event. The In addition, the source was written in 2012 which marked the 67 anniversary of the nuclear bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. It is different from those anally sees which were written years ago or right after the bombing. This indicates that after decades of the atomic bombing, the author can analyses the whole thing based on abundant research h and investigation conducted throughout the 67 years from a new and longer pop into of view.

The source states quite objective analysis instead of subjective or extreme pop onions, it mainly focuses on explaining the complexity of the situation at that time. The resource analyzes several general reasons why the LISA dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki including ending the war at the earliest possible moment, to justify the cost of Manhattan Project, to impress the Soviets, a lack of incentives not to use the bomb and r espousing to the Pearl Harbor.

The source also lists out several alternatives instead of the tat mimic bomb and its possible effects, it also points out additional considerations when the gave rent decided to drop the bomb which is rare in other sources. Source Analysis The source made an argument that the LISA made the final decision to release he atomic bomb for various reasons and the bombing indeed ended the war quiz sickly and efficiently while saved more lives instead of sacrificing more casualties.

The source analyses the reasons President Truman decided to bomb Japan WI The an atomic bomb which can support its argument. One of the reasons he did so w as that he wanted to end the war at the earliest possible moment at the lowest possible cost. He focused on looking for the most effective way to end the war quickly. So as we can see , the main purpose of dropping the atomic bomb is to end the war quickly and reduce ca ululates so of course the decision was considered as the best method the government can t cake to achieve that point.

This supports the argument that the atomic bomb dropping ended the war in a efficient way and reduced casualties. The Manhattan Project cost about $1 which made it a pity not to reveal its power and it exactly met the need to end war in a efficient and quick way. Fro m this we can also see that a weapon was designed to be use instead of being a symbol of high technology, the unknown power and the temptation of showing made the atomic boom b the first choice thou any doubts for the government to end the war quickly.

The article mentioned though it was quite obvious that Japan was losing the w AR at that time, but it showed little inclination to surrender but a strong determination t o fight to death. The most important task at that time was to find out the most effective way to end the war as quickly as possible. So we can tell the atomic bomb was selected because it w as definitely the most deadly weapon without any doubt that could distinguish the idea to fight within the Japanese and it could also justify the cost of Manhattan Project and impress t e Soviet Union.

Japan finally surrendered six days after the bombing which proved the atomic bomb’s effect on ending the war quickly which could prove the effect of the atomic bomb in ending the war quickly. Also from the above evidence, the earlier the war ended, the less case ululates there would be, so the atomic bomb ended the war more quickly so it also reduced the number of injuries and deaths caused by battles and brought happiness to more families who were suffering a longing heart to their sons and daughters. Another evidence mentioned in the source is that, before the atomic bomb, t he IIS was engaged in a massive war with the Japanese.

As the summer of 1 945 began, t he US military campaign continued to involve numerous aerial raids as well as large scale NV salon on Japanese islands which cost 31 5,922 deaths of Japanese, and the number was greater than the estimated deaths attributed to the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nag assai. If the atomic bomb was unavailable at that time, the LISA would even plan another I rage scale invasion of Japan codenamed Operation Downfall for the fall of 1945 which is hoped to overwhelm the Japanese and end the war.

This evidence showed the atomic b MBA indeed saved many lives both of Japanese and Americans. In my points of view, Both American and Japanese soldiers were dying in those e massive battles and the conventional aerial bombs were also killing many many peace full Japanese civilians. Germany had surrendered but the Japanese were ready to fight to d death no matter how many people had died. The longer the war lasted, the more people both from Japan and America were killed.

So it was clear that it was necessary for President Trauma n to find out a way to end the war as quickly as possible to stop increasing the number of ca casualties with the minimum cost and there came the atomic bomb which was powerful and des directive enough to threaten Japan to surrender. Many people argue that the atomic bomb was not necessary and the source mentioned several alternatives that the USA could choose instead of using the atomic boo MBA, the alternatives include intensifying conventional bombing and the naval blocked e, allowing the Japanese to retain the Emperor and waiting for the Soviet Union to enter the war.

But no one would ever know whether one of these alternatives could act as the same fee CT as the atomic bomb to end the war quickly meanwhile save more civilians. The situation was complex, but history has proved that the atomic bomb did its role quite well in ending the war quickly because Japan surrendered 6 days after the boo numbing and it marked the end of the second World War. Statement by the President Announcing the Use of the Bomb at Hiroshima http://traumatically. Rig/publishers/ index O=atomic -bomb This source is the official statement to the world from the white house oaf term they dropped the atomic bomb. The statement was drafted several days before the atomic bombing for the President Harry S. Trauma’s announcement about the atomic bomb on USGS t 6, 1945. The source is reliable because it was the official statement and it was one of the m cost original sources to study the case Of the Aqua’s atomic bombing on Hiroshima in 1945.

The source was provided by Truman Library where contains many original archives about President Truman and the statement was a photo of the original copy, hence the source was reliable. Among many thesis on the Internet which talk about the Aqua’s atomic boo numbing on Hiroshima in 1945, this source stood for the opinion of the Aqua’s government at that time which was official and made it more directly to study the Aqua’s government’s points of view of he bombing and why they did that. The other thesis and analyses contain per zonal opinion on the case of Aqua’s atomic bombing on Hiroshima less or more which make this source unique.

The source not only explained the reason why the government droop De the atomic bomb, it also described how the atomic tech oenology developed in the ASSAI and what the cost was. We can also read about the Aqua’s opinion on Japan and what they wanted d to say hid among the words which made the source very useful. Hence, the source is reliable and useful to be used to do further analysis on the case of the Aqua’s atomic bombing on Hiroshima. The statement at first stated that an American airplane dropped one boo MBA on Hiroshima and described briefly how powerful the bomb was.

It compared the atomic boo MBA with the British ‘Grand Slam’ and claimed the atomic bomb was about 2,000 times moor e powerful than the latter One. Then the Statement criticized Japan for its attack on pearl Hard our and pointed out the end was not yet. The Japanese started the war so they should receive what they gave out and the war must be ended. As we can see from here, they wrote this in their statement because they wanted to justify their action to bomb the Hiroshima in spite of the sacrifice of so many useful Japanese civilians.

They wanted to show that they did this because Japan was their rival in the Pacific War and it was the Japanese who started the war, they wanted the world think that Japanese was the one who deserved the a misspelling weapon like the atomic bomb, and what they did was only to defeat them for revenge and protection, they did The is only to end the war and bring the world the peace. Then, they mentioned this weapon increased the destruction ability of The Eire armed force and they were producing more bombs like this and making them more power full.